Edward Corrie vs Cem Ilkel Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L W W L W W L L
Form
L W L W W L W W W LHead-To-Head: Corrie 1 - 1 Ilkel
They have played 4 sets in total, with Corrie winning 2 and Ilkel winning 2. The last match between Corrie and Ilkel was at the Loughborough Challenger, 21-05-2018, First, I.hard with Cem Ilkel getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Edward Corrie | 1 |
| Cem Ilkel | 1 |
Loughborough Challenger(21-05-2018)
6
3
6
4
| Corrie | Stats | Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 78% (29-8) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| Ret. | Ranking | 574 |
| 215 | Highest Rank | 144 |
| 37 | Age | 29 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 7 | Titles | 7 |
| 57% (308-229) | Career Total W/L | 57% (437-334) |
| $14,925 | Career Prize Money | $225,530 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 2 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Alexandrova VS Kasatkina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fonseca VS Paul PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Cem Ilkel
Player
Edward Corrie
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
19 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats
Edward Corrie
Player
Cem Ilkel
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 19 | Games Won | 17 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:0:5 | Average Match Time | 1:0:5 |
| 59% (56/95) | 1st Serve % | 62% (67/108) |
| 75% (42/56) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (47/67) |
| 64% (25/39) | 2nd Serve Win % | 61% (25/41) |
| 27% (3/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 67% (2/3) |
| 33% (36/108) | Return Points Win % | 29% (28/95) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Edward Corrie Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Marius Copil
Player
Edward Corrie
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
82)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
84%
(
42 of
50)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
42 of
57)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
22 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
27 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tobias Kamke
Player
Edward Corrie
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Edward Corrie
Player
Jonathan Gray
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
56
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Edward Corrie
Player
Joshua Paris
74%
(
60 of
81)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
89)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
39 of
59)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
25 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Edward Corrie
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Edward Corrie
Player
Jack Molloy
54%
(
32 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
68 of
101)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
40 of
68)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
25%
(
5 of
20)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
101)
89
Total Points Won
71
|
3-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Edward Corrie
Player
Christian Harrison
74%
(
59 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
84)
7
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
24 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Edward Corrie
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
19 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Edward Corrie
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
84)
3
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
2
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
23 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
31 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Niels Desein
Player
Edward Corrie
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
59 of
87)
8
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
0
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
33%
(
29 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
87)
90
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Cem Ilkel
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
9
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
87%
(
40 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Evgenii Tiurnev
67%
(
56 of
83)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
2
Aces
12
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
30 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
23 of
64)
76
Total Points Won
71
|
2-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Michal Krajci
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
11
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
22 of
29)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Kanan Gasimov
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Cem Ilkel
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
76%
(
62 of
82)
11
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
39 of
62)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
24 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
6-1 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Matteo Lavizzari
58%
(
57 of
98)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
99)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
6
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
47 of
59)
56%
(
23 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
34 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 2-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
David Poljak
61%
(
62 of
101)
1st Serve %
62%
(
68 of
110)
9
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
47 of
68)
64%
(
25 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
30%
(
30 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
41 of
110)
112
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(3) 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mert Alkaya
Player
Cem Ilkel
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Henri Haupt
31%
(
4 of
13)
1st Serve %
73%
(
11 of
15)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
89%
(
8 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
8%
(
1 of
13)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
22
Total Points Won
6
|
5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Cem Ilkel
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (308/229) | Win/Loss | 57% (437/334) |
| 57% (706/538) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (976/807) |
| 52% (6226/5640) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (8747/8216) |
| 53% (81/71) | Hard Win/Loss | 62% (287/178) |
| 53% (19/17) | Clay Win/Loss | 45% (57/71) |
| 64% (167/94) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55% (92/76) |
| 47% (41/47) | Grass Win/Loss | 10% (1/9) |
| 0.2 | Aces Per Game | 0.34 |
| 1187 | Aces Total | 2840 |
| 0.09 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 540 | Total Double Faults | 1378 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:14:59 |
| 602.49 | Average Opponent Rank | 531.68 |
| 61% (10188/16730) | 1st Serve % | 58% (23978/41029) |
| 71% (7235/10188) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (16866/23978) |
| 51% (3332/6542) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (8703/17051) |
| 37% (594/1588) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (1616/3998) |
| 38% (6466/17102) | Return Points Win % | 39% (16139/41486) |
| 33% (3/6) | Slam W/L | 32% (7/15) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 67% (2/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 32% (7/15) |
| 11% (1/8) | Main Tour W/L | 18% (5/23) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 47% (83/94) | Challenger W/L | 52% (175/159) |
| 65% (221/121) | Futures W/L | 67% (241/121) |
| 58% (306/532) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (425/752) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 40% (4/10) |
| 51% (85/168) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (146/272) |
| 47% (80/172) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (130/232) |
| 83% (315/262) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (423/361) |
| 17% (315/52) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (423/60) |
| 20% (221/45) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (347/74) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
